May 27, 2004
John Kerry, Snobby Snubber

John Kerry was in Seattle yesterday for a $1,000 a plate dinner, advertised by the Dems as "Please Join John Kerry for Dinner".

But the snobby John Kerry snubbed even his most loyal fans (who can't afford healthcare, we're told), but can afford to pay $1,000 to eat dinner with politicians. The Seattle Times reports:

[John and Teresa Kerry] left last night's $1,000-a-plate fund-raiser at the Westin Hotel and had dinner at Canlis, overlooking Lake Union.
First he doesn't want to be nominated at his own nominating convention, now he doesn't want to eat dinner at his own fundraising dinner.

I hear that Canlis is a wonderful restaurant and I hope Senator and Mrs. Kerry enjoyed their dinner. I have a hunch the French-looking Massachusetts Democrat and his wife might have ordered the "Vegetable Napoleon".

Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at May 27, 2004 11:36 AM
Comments

do you prefer the fake 'farmhand' routine laid out by the incumbent from kennebunkport....errr.crawford.

Posted by: dinesh on May 27, 2004 12:41 PM

You poor guy. You're all alone in Seattle with your right-wing whining, aren't you? : (

Posted by: John Kerry on May 27, 2004 01:50 PM

Dinesh

Yes, I would prefer the "farmhand". He at least shows courtesy to those who support him.

I do not appreciate Mr. Kerry's aristocratic (and fake) attitude at all. He is King George revisited.

Posted by: Pearl on May 27, 2004 01:52 PM

He takes the money, runs away from his own fund raiser to eat at a restaurant stiffing is own constituents? You gotta believe their are some very pissed off Democrats choking down their dinner at the hotel wondering why they came.

Posted by: Gary B on May 27, 2004 02:21 PM

If I had paid $1000 for a fundraiser featuring a candidate who bailed to eat elsewhere, I'd draw enough conclusions about his character to switch parties immediately, and demand a refund in the next breath.

Tar and feathers...

Posted by: Insufficiently Sensitive on May 27, 2004 03:53 PM

gee, so what did ken lay get for all of his "donations" to bush?

i'm sure he made is speech, collected the checks and hit the door?

are you people either so naive or so partisan to see that the fundraising circuit is about collecting checks, making a speech, hitting the rope line for a few handshakes, then hitting the exit? oh, maybe some of you think that for $1000, that you get really tasty chicken or really tasty salmon?

please. find an issue.....say like the war in iraq, healthcare, education, stem cell research, the budget. republicans have all 3 branches of the federal govt (yes i'm including 5/9 of the supreme court) and most americans think the country is headed in the wrong direction. you can fool some people some of the time, but......

i'm no fan of kerry, but like i said, doing coke and alcohol from ages 20-40, waking up hungover on your 40th birthday, converting to fundamentalist christianity and getting a "call" from god does not qualify a person to be the president, even if his dad was. daddy's rolodex ain't that big. can recycle only so many cold-war veterans.

bush jr. is more properly the subject of a vh1 behind the music, not the white house.

but many of you think with partisan blinders, and could never accept the fact that your man is screwing this country. you whined about clinton's lack of (everything), yet you find it impossible to offer any critique of your own guy, and resort to this type of entertainment tonight style politics. please. get serious---after all its the leader of the free world we're talking here, not the co-star of the next tom cruise movie.

Posted by: dinesh on May 27, 2004 04:35 PM

you guys are classic--read the whole article. he did not stiff his constituents.

now i know why 60% of americans believe that saddam was involved in 9/11.

Posted by: dinesh on May 27, 2004 04:38 PM

Dinesh,

I read the whole article (again). What exactly do you think is in the article that I got wrong?

Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on May 27, 2004 09:19 PM

I believe that I read (or heard) that this was the wedding anniversary for that most romantic couple, John and Teresa. That would explain their private dinner.

And, to be fair, the fund raiser may have been scheduled by some one who did not know that.

All that said, John "Do You Know Who I Am" Kerry has a certain reputation back in Massachusetts. Think what he must have done to get most of the reporters at the Boston Globe to despise him. That wasn't easy considering how much they agree on issues.

Posted by: Jim Miller on May 28, 2004 04:43 AM

Shark Man:

The article states:
"[John and Teresa Kerry] left last night's $1,000-a-plate fund-raiser at the Westin Hotel and had dinner at Canlis, overlooking Lake Union."

You write:

"...John Kerry snubbed even his most loyal fans..."


Where's the snub? He showed up, collected the checks and left. Nowhere in the article does it indicate that people were snubbed or felt snubbed.

So the man wanted to have an anniversary dinner with his wife. What's the big deal? Its not like he lied about WMD or something or the grave and gathering danger of saddam hussein.

Posted by: dinesh on May 28, 2004 02:00 PM

Dinesh sounds a lot like Helen Thomas. You know Helen, she of the front row seat as part of the White House Press Core. She has warmed that chair since the Lincoln Administration. After another unhinged outburst from her, everybody just smiles and says, oh that's just Helen. Then they go on to something productive.

Posted by: Gary B on May 28, 2004 02:49 PM

dinesh,
I would have said that George Bush doesn't make a good president just because he's W's father :)

Posted by: maor on May 30, 2004 10:47 AM

"He showed up, collected the checks and left. Nowhere in the article does it indicate that people were snubbed or felt snubbed."

What in the F is your definition of snub, if not this?

And for the last time, it's George H.
W. Bush and George W. Bush. He's not a junior. (slapping forhead for the umpteenth time after reading a Dinesh post)

Posted by: jimg on May 30, 2004 05:04 PM

thanks for the lesson jimg. may i suggest you go to a major party fundraiser for either kerry or bush.

i like to call him jr. seeing that he has a nickname for everybody, i thought i'd give him one. and seeing that his closest advisors are retreads from his father, jr. seems fitting.

Posted by: dinesh on June 1, 2004 10:53 AM
New comments may be posted only from the 'Comments' links at the bottom of each entry on the blog home page