Helen Thomas, the doyenne of the Washington press corps approximately since the antebellum, is inventing property rights that have never existed.
If President Bush wants to give land away, there is always his 1,600-acre ranch at Crawford, Texas.Where was Helen during the illegal occupation of the West Bank by Jordan?But he has no right to endorse the Israeli claim to the captured or settled property on the West Bank that belongs to the Palestinians.
And what would she have to say about this?
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at April 20, 2004 10:34 AMhelen thomas, of arab extraction, is generally considered an anti israeli and and maybe an antisemite. it is widely rumoured she blackballed william safire from washingtons major journalist organization because she considered him too pro israeli. would be interesting for someone to follow this up with safire directly.
Posted by: avi green on April 20, 2004 03:40 PMhelen thomas, of arab extraction, is generally considered an anti israeli and and maybe an antisemite. it is widely rumoured she blackballed william safire from washingtons major journalist organization because she considered him too pro israeli. would be interesting for someone to follow this up with safire directly.
Posted by: avi green on April 20, 2004 03:41 PMFoxNews had a dinner a year ago where all the reporters and on air personalities attended. And they had a comedy show where some of them dressed up and played parts or did immitations.
I remember they showed a few of the skits on Fox and Friends I think one morning when I was watching. And one of the guys immitated Helen Thomas mockingly and said something like "All the bloodthirsty Jews in the media" or something like that.
Mike
Posted by: Mike on April 20, 2004 10:44 PMIsn't that curious. I thought the Jordanians had formally given up all claim to the West Bank, recognizing the PLO as the legitimate voice of the Palestinian people.
Posted by: Alex Bensky on April 21, 2004 05:01 AMThe real problem in the Israel-Palestine issue is the idea of local Arabs being flooded by Jewish immigrants who set up a non-Moslem, non-Arab state (albeit on a tiny sliver of land).
Whether you support Israel or not (and I do), it's a legitimate issue. The anti-semitism that surrounds it is not legitmate, nor some of the methods of resistance but the issue is legitimate itself.
Zionists like to point out that there never were any Palestinians because they were just part of the general surrounding Arab populace. That's why when Jordan takes over it's not the same thing as Israel doing so.
Posted by: Canadian Headhunter on April 21, 2004 05:59 AMTaranto on Best of the Web always refers to the frothign anti Semite Helen Thomas as "the nutty old aunt who lives in the attic."
Posted by: Joel on April 21, 2004 11:29 AMI didn't realize that Helen Thomas was an anti-Semite. And here I was ready to chalk up her statement to senility...
Posted by: Tongue Boy on April 21, 2004 01:05 PMRemember that the land which Israel is appropriating never belonged to Palestinians. It is public land which legally still belongs to England which left in 1948. Israel is not taking land which is owned privately by Palestinians. Some of it may have actually been owned by Jews before they were expelled in 1948.
Posted by: Jed on April 22, 2004 06:54 AMThank God I live in a country where there is no "Palestinian land" or "Jewish land" or "white land" or "mexican land." The dirt that my house sits on is simply "my land" cuz I'm the grantee of the deed. True, there are areas that we can call a "black neighborhood" because most of the residents are black, or "italian neighborhood" etc., but that's far different from what that shrill hag Helen Thomas means by "Palestinian land."
Wouldn't it be great if in Israel some day there would be no Jewish or Palestinian land, just land owned by whoever bought it from the previous owner. But that's wishful thinking.
Pakistan was created roughly the same time as Israel - except it was land taken away from India and given to muslims. I don't see anyone screaming over Pakistan being illegally occupied territory. The truth is - radical islamists are nothing more than nazis who want it ALL - not just Israel. What's the excuse for the terrorism in every other place they've attacked in the last twelve years. They try to make it look like different "struggles" but it's not. All their excuses are a smoke screen. The Iranian clerics are the new Hitler.
Posted by: Darryl on April 22, 2004 09:49 AMThe thing is someone of Arab origin is a Semite and so can hardly be called anti-Semitic. Anti-Jewish perhaps, but not anti-Semitic. Being Semitic is something *shared* by Jews, Arabs and others in the Middle East. And despite the historic claims the fact that the majority of us are actually in recent history of European extraction means that Arabs have more of a claim to the term anyway.
Leah
Posted by: Leah on August 30, 2004 11:42 AM