Last week's Seattle Weekly had a terrific cover story on the disastrous Seattle Monorail. One of the problems with the Monorail is that it is funded entirely by an excess registration tax on automobiles registered in Seattle, but many city residents are registering their cars elsewhere to avoid the tax and this has created a serious budget shortfall.
I wrote several weeks ago that it is an appropriate act of civil disobedience to register one's car outside of Seattle to avoid the Monorail tax. In fact, I was wrong. It is not an act of civil disobedience as it is not against the law. There has never been a legal requirement in Washington to register one's vehicle at one's primary residence. (The House Bill Report for the bill that failed in the legislature in an attempt to change the situation makes this very clear). In other words, the Monorail car tax as approved by the voters was voluntary, not mandatory, and those who choose not to pay it are entirely within their rights. Nevertheless, the local newspapers continue to editorialize against the non-payers as "scofflaws" and "evaders" when they are not. (examples: P-I Feb. 15, Seattle Times March 1, and the aforementioned article in the Seattle Weekly).
I wrote letters to both the Times and Weekly alerting them to their error. The Weekly published my letter in this week's issue. The Times has not published my letter.
Posted by Stefan Sharkansky at March 11, 2004 10:34 AMI dunno, the current version of RCW § 46.16.040(1) sounds pretty clear to me. "Name and address of the owner of the vehicle" doesn't mean you get to make up a name and an address at random.
Posted by: Xrlq on March 12, 2004 05:43 PMWell, X, read the bill report I linked to. Apparently enough people in the legislature concluded that existing laws don't require people to use their primary (i.e. voting) residence as the address for vehicle registration and that a new law would be necessary to achieve that result.
Posted by: Stefan Sharkansky on March 12, 2004 07:32 PM